In tonight’s debate, Mitt Romney said he “believes in God”. What does THAT mean?

A long time ago, before I had much personal exposure to Alcoholics Anonymous or the culture of recovery, I had a wonderful yoga teacher who had apparently done some 12-step work at some point in his own getting-sober project.  He didn’t talk about it much, but in retrospect I can see its influence all over his teaching.  I remember he once mentioned the concept of “higher power” during a particularly challenging moment in a yoga class, and then he said something to the effect of “It doesn’t matter WHAT your higher power is, it could be Jesus Christ or it could be a doorknob, the important thing is that it’s not your own ego!” 

I’ve done some recovery work of my own now, and I’ve had enough exposure to other people’s recovery (and lack thereof) to have a deep appreciation for the concept of “higher power”.

I have all kinds of issues with “god”.  Who doesn’t?   My 20-year-old son told me recently that as a young child he envisioned god as a giant man with a long white beard and flowing robes. So did I. I guess as human beings it’s hard not to project our own experiences and emotional baggage onto the mysterious forces that we sometimes refer to as “god”.  It’s okay as long as we are aware of it.

I get it that language is one of the primary means by which human beings express ourselves, and the more I talk, and the more I write, the more I know that words are sacred.  Even profanity can be sacred.  But language is limiting and to put language around “god” is a formidable task.  It also may be a completely unnecessary task, but humans seem to have the need to do so.

When someone says “I don’t believe in god” or “I believe in god“, neither statement means a thing to me without context.  In fact, both statements could mean exactly the same thing.  So in the final minutes of the debate tonight, when Mitt Romney threw out the comment “My passion probably flows from the fact that I believe in God.”, it sounded to me like he was saying nothing at all.

Because I had a completely non-religious upbringing, I have a different pile of baggage about god than some of my spiritually brow-beaten cradle-Catholic friends and others I’ve known who as children were subjected to all sorts of religious nonsense.  As an adult, the Catholic religion gave me a way to rebel against my non-religious upbringing.  It offered me a preliminary framework in which to explore the idea of god, and gave me some tools to use in the process.  Religion offered me some good things that can be tough to find in our society, and for that I am grateful.  At the same time, I found out pretty quickly that I am not at all okay with aligning myself with institutionalized racism, sexism, homophobia, and other hurtful human behavior particularly in the name of god.  I know the difference between right and wrong, and my conscience tells me I cannot abide this.

What I can abide is the idea of my “higher power”.   It’s not THAT hard to imagine that there are powerful forces around me that I can lean into that are not my own damned ego….forces like community, like love, or like that wonderful doorknob, the one which can help me open the door to something better for myself over and over again.

Recently at my yoga studio, I picked the card pictured from a box of cards with quotes by the Sufi leader Pir Vilayat Inayat Khan. Check it out.

-Pir Vilayat Inayat Khan


15 thoughts on “In tonight’s debate, Mitt Romney said he “believes in God”. What does THAT mean?

  1. When someone says “I don’t believe in god” or “I believe in god“, neither statement means a thing to me without context.
    In saying that, you’ve said it all.

  2. I prefer the attitude in the UK. No one CARES if politicians believe in god. It’s not seen as relevant to the job in the slightest. In fact, ex-PM Tony Blair was seen as a bit of a wet for talking about his religious beliefs and then very publicly converting from Anglicanism to Catholicism. Funny how the people who go all crazy about constitutional amendment rights and gun control pay no attention to the genuine separation of church and state.

    • It is funny, isn’t it! It’s also the same people who talk about “small government” and government staying out of people’s lives who seem to want to get up in everyone’s business about everything too.

  3. Really intriguing and well written post. I grew up in an Assemblies of God family and I can tell you that many of my relatives still think of God as a dude in a white gown with flowing hair. I love the quote and that’s exactly one of the things I played with in my novel. One of the characters IS God, but not any particular one – a universal god, if you will.

    Don’t try to reason about Republicans; you’ll only give yourself a headache.

  4. I get confused when people like Mittens use the same word to decribe his um…faith as other people do. I grew up anglican, which is somewaht conservative, but I never heard any of the anti-human stuff that seems to justify burning single mothers and Muslims at the political stake. Maybe I wasn’t listening…
    Anyway, I’m a recovering anglican now…
    If I was in a relationship with the G man, however, my divine BF would look nothing like Mitt’s. Anyway, he seems to know what he’s talking about.

  5. It is confusing, because what DOES it mean? It could mean SO MANY things to say “I believe in God”. In the case of Mitt Romney, I hope we never have to find out what he means exactly. Pretty sure that his “God” and my higher power are living in different “heavens”.

  6. “When someone says “I don’t believe in god” or “I believe in god“, neither statement means a thing to me without context”

    No pun intended, but Amen!
    People really lose me when they say that. When I was younger I would say, unequivocally that I didn’t believe in God. Well I was young and dumb. It took some growing up to understand that I do believe in a higher power, just not the typical, Christian idea of the old, white man with the flowing robes. Organized religion is very scary to me. There’s such a mob mentality that occurs. Religious beliefs should be personal and quiet. Not voiced over a megaphone for all to hear. I don’t see the point in it. When Mr. Romney or any politician start spouting off about their beliefs, I get anxious. It’s fine and dandy to have those beliefs. Legislating for the country based on a personal set of beliefs is reckless in my opinion.

    • Completely reckless, and isn’t it antithetical to the ideals that our country was founded on? I don’t get it. How would some of those right-wing Christians like it if some extremists from another religion started trying to push their personal beliefs into our government. They wouldn’t like it at all…such hypocrisy going on right now.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s